Advanced Search
 
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1

    Default Zakir Naik's QADIYANI Belief

    Bismillahir Rahmanir Raheem

    Assalamu 'Alaykum wa Rahmatullahi wa Barakatuhu



    dr zakir naik's qadiyani belief


    In his speeches and writings dr zakir naik claims that advent of Prophet Mohammad (صلى الله عليه و آله وسلم) has been mentioned in Hindu scriptures. He has made this claim thousands of time in his lectures.

    People will be surprised to know that dr zakir naik's rhetoric on this subject is a direct copy of the work titled "Mohammad (صلى الله عليه و آله وسلم) in world scriptures" written by Abdul Haq Vidyarthi Qadiyani (1888 - 1977), a missionary of Lahore Ahmadiyya Movement.

    Answering a question in one of his lectures, whether Muslims can consider the Vedas and the other Hindu Scriptures to be the revelations of God? dr zakir naik replied:

    There is no text in the Quran or Sahih Hadith mentioning the name of the revelation that was sent to India. Since the names of the Vedas or other Hindu scriptures are nowhere to be found in Quran and Sahih Hadith, one cannot say for sure that they were the revelations of God. They may be the revelation of God or may not be the revelation of God.


    However in all his speeches, he mentions the Vedic and other Hindu scriptures that were originally invented and documented by Abdul Haq Vidyarthi Qadiyani, word-by-word; and reiterates that advent of Prophet Mohammad (صلى الله عليه و آله وسلم) has been prophecied in Hindu scriptures.

    This practice on the part of dr zakir naik establishes the fact that he believes in Hindu scriptures as the word of God (in an altered format as that of Bible) though he does not want to declare it openly.

    His profound belief in Hindu scriptures as the word of God is also established from the following facts.


    dr naik mentions the following Quranic verse hundreds of times in his speeches and invites Hindus to come to common terms with Muslims.

    It is in Quran - قُلْ يَا أَهْلَ الْكِتَابِ تَعَالَوْا إِلَىٰ كَلِمَةٍ سَوَاءٍ بَيْنَنَا وَبَيْنَكُمْ أَلَّا نَعْبُدَ إِلَّا اللَّهَ وَلَا نُشْرِكَ بِهِ شَيْئًا وَلَا يَتَّخِذَ بَعْضُنَا بَعْضًا أَرْبَابًا مِّن دُونِ اللَّهِ ۚ فَإِن تَوَلَّوْا فَقُولُوا اشْهَدُوا بِأَنَّا مُسْلِمُونَ [Meaning - Say: ( O' Prophet - صلى الله عليه و آله وسلم) "O People of the Book! come to common terms as between us and you: That we worship none but Allah (سبحانہ و تعا لی), that we associate no partners with him; that we associate not, from among ourselves, Lords and patrons other than Allah (سبحانہ و تعا لی)." If then they turn back, you say: "Bear witness that we are Muslims]. (Aal-e-Imran - 64).

    The above verse is addressed to the people of the book ( revealed to Prophets). This verse does not address Idol worshipers.

    It is a well known fact that Hindu Idol worship is similar to Makkan Pagan tradition and we are positive that no Muslim in the world will ever dispute this fact.

    We have not come across a Hadith in which Prophet Mohammad (صلى الله عليه و آله وسلم) called upon Idol worshipers to come to common terms with Islam.

    Why then dr naik reads the above verse and invites Hindus to come to common terms?

    This practice of dr naik confirms the fact that he believes in all Hindu scriptures as the word of God.

    As a matter of fact he has never denied that these scriptures are not the word of God as he says these may be or may not be the word of God.


    فورم سے متعلقہ کسی بھی قسم کی معلومات یا شکایات کی صورت میں ہمیں فیس بک پر ابھی رابطہ کریں

    facebook.com/islamicdatabase/




  2. #2

    Default

    This is hypocrisy (Munafiqat)

    Dr. Naik calls Zoroastrianism a prophetic religion and calls its founder Zoroaster as 'Prophet'. In one of his lectures he said: "Zoroastrianism is a Non Semitic, Aryan, Non Vedic religion, which is not associated with Hinduism and it is a Prophetic religion. Zoroastrianism is also called as Parsism and it was founded by Prophet Zoroaster. Reference - (Concept of God in Major Religions - from the CD - 'Presenting Islam and Clarifying Misconceptions' - Lecture series by Dr. Naik, Developed by AHYA Multi Media - 12 Enlightening Sessions).

    Quran testifies that all Prophets gave the same message about Allah (سبحانہ و تعا لی). But Zoroaster preached worship of fire. We do not understand how Dr. Naik testifies Zoroaster as prophet

    Why Dr. Naik is afraid to declare his Qadiyani beliefs in public?


    Read the following to know the answer.

    (a) If he accepts openly Hindu scriptures, as word of God, then he will have to accept (like Qadiyanis do) that Ram, Krishna, Buddha, Ashoka and Guru Nanak were all Prophets and that Kalki Avatar (the 10th incarnation of Hindu God Vishnu to appear before dooms day) is the (final) Prophet.

    (b) Qadiyanis are treated as out of Islam in the Muslim world and it is difficult for Dr. Naik to openly disclose his Qadiyani beliefs because it will create a lot of problems for him in Muslim community. Dr. Naik knows pretty well, what will happen to him if he discloses his above hidden beliefs in public.



    Important Note: Similar as the qadianis can call people to their belief (with the totally wrong conception in the finality of Prophethood), the munaafiq zakir naik too call people to his belief, there's nothing impressive that he does. The fact that he first fills the heart of his audience with the totally wrong notion that our Beloved Master Sayyidinah Muhammad (Sallal Laahu Ta'ala Alayhi Wa Sallam) was and is no more (Nauzubillah) is enough to conclude that when same people accepts his path the Kalimah that is read is in contradiction with what the person has in their heart. Their key belief on our Beloved Prophet (Sallal Laahu Ta'ala Alayhi Wa Sallam) is not as the belief of a Muslim.

    Qadianis too read the Kalimah but because of their corrupt belief on the finality of Prohethood they are not muslims. Now what becomes of someone who after listening to zakir naik reads the Kalimah with the belief that He (Sallal Laahu Ta'ala Alayhi Wa Sallam) is no more (Nauzubillah) from the perspective of naik.......can such individual be considered a msulim

    They can distort the meaning of the Kalimah as they wish under the pretext of different meaning for a word or sentence in the arabic language but in the Qur'an Shareef the meaning is the same as the Ahle Sunnah wal Jama'ah believe in their heart, i.e., Muhammad (Sallal Laahu Ta'ala Alayhi Wa Sallam) IS the Noble Messenger of Allah (Azzawajal) and NOT was as the hypocrites believe and propagate through their means.

    مُّحَمَّدٌ رَّسُولُ ٱللَّهِ

    [Kanzul Imaan, Surah Fath 48, Verse 29] Muhammad (Peace and Blessings be upon Him) is the Noble Messenger of Allah;

    فورم سے متعلقہ کسی بھی قسم کی معلومات یا شکایات کی صورت میں ہمیں فیس بک پر ابھی رابطہ کریں

    facebook.com/islamicdatabase/




  3. #3

    فورم سے متعلقہ کسی بھی قسم کی معلومات یا شکایات کی صورت میں ہمیں فیس بک پر ابھی رابطہ کریں

    facebook.com/islamicdatabase/




  4. #4

    Default

    This is confusing me,Not sure whether this thing is appropriate or not.But yeah a statement can be given without understand how someone acts on things that hey conveys ahead.This is its necessary to be.
    For doing better in Arabic Ways to Learn the Arabic Language can help us a lot.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

taucheruhrdirekt.com